Review economics
Cinnamon/kotaemon
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥0%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#814 feat: integrate PaddleOCR as document loaders + enhance chat/index UX
11 reviews · 84.3d to merge
#823 fix: update default Cohere rerank model to rerank-v4.0-fast
2 reviews · 2h to merge
#813 feat: support MCP tools and enhance resource updating with renaming c…
1 reviews · 4.2d to merge
#790 feat(build): add uv package manager support for faster installation
2 reviews · 148.0d to merge
#755 fix: add validation to avoid path-traversal vulnerabilities
2 reviews · 25.9d to merge
How this was measured
0% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 195 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read Cinnamon/kotaemon weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on Cinnamon/kotaemon — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository