Review economics
ChrisRM/material-theme-jetbrains
Read from the 69 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
69
Other PRs
69
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#1623 Prevent memory leak on application close.
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#1591 Enable accented spotlight border.
0 reviews · 9h to merge
#1541 Added accent color to live indicator.
0 reviews · 8h to merge
#1504 Create FUNDING.yml
0 reviews · 10h to merge
#1390 Using library that is shared across more IDEs
0 reviews · 22h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read ChrisRM/material-theme-jetbrains weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on ChrisRM/material-theme-jetbrains — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository