Review economics
AprilNEA/OpenLogi
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.2× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥4%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
97
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
#415 fix: divert thumbwheel for rotation rebinds even without single-tap capability
1 reviews · 14.6d to merge
#358 Windows follow-ups: app icon, working update checks, settings fixes, docs
2 reviews · 13.0d to merge
#337 fix(gui): avoid RefCell panic when applying theme on OS appearance change
1 reviews · 12.8d to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#508 fix(i18n): complete Crowdin synchronization
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#505 ci(i18n): harden Crowdin translation sync
1 reviews · 13h to merge
#507 fix(gui): improve card contrast and depth
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#502 fix(gui): keep selected gallery device in view
0 reviews · 16h to merge
#501 feat(gui): clarify pairing failures and offline editing
0 reviews · 20h to merge
How this was measured
4% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 235 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read AprilNEA/OpenLogi weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on AprilNEA/OpenLogi — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository