Review economics
linshenkx/prompt-optimizer
Read from the 58 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.6× the time to merge of the rest.
≥3%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
55
Other PRs
58
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#317 fix: invalid CSS border value, broken class attribute, passive scroll listener
0 reviews · 4.4d to merge
#315 fix(docker): launch mcp-server via node directly to avoid pnpm verify-deps crash
0 reviews · 3.0d to merge
#308 Fixed the OpenAI error when calling large image models: Unknown param…
0 reviews · 5.2d to merge
#307 feat: upgrade MiniMax default model to M3
0 reviews · 10h to merge
#132 feat(web): 宽屏样式优化 (#131)
1 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
3% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read linshenkx/prompt-optimizer weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on linshenkx/prompt-optimizer — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository