Review economics
josephmisiti/awesome-machine-learning
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥2%
Attributed
a floor
2
Attributed PRs
98
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 2
The rest — the latest 5
#1398 Add BESSER Neural Network Editor
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#1397 Add Cortexa to Tools/Misc
0 reviews · 20h to merge
#1395 Add Leanpass autodiff library to README
0 reviews · 4h to merge
#1392 Add shimmytok (Rust - Natural Language Processing)
0 reviews · 16h to merge
#1391 Pull request for awesome-machine-learning
0 reviews · 1h to merge
How this was measured
2% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 926 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read josephmisiti/awesome-machine-learning weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on josephmisiti/awesome-machine-learning — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository