Review economics

Zie619/n8n-workflows

Read from the 34 most recently merged pull requests ·

Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.3× the time to merge of the rest.

≥21%

Attributed

a floor

6

Attributed PRs

28

Other PRs

34

Read

Per pull requestAttributedRestRatio
Review rounds0.00.0
Reviews submitted0.50.32.0×
Reverts0.00.0
Time to merge25h3.3d0.3×

How this was measured

21% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.

Detected: Claude Code, Cursor agent, GitHub Copilot coding agent, Google Jules.

“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits

XLinkedInHacker News
Review tax badge for Zie619/n8n-workflows

The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.

Tell me when this moves

We re-read Zie619/n8n-workflows weekly and email only when the number changes materially.

Read your own repos

This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.

npx @ambera/review-tax

Want this continuously on Zie619/n8n-workflows — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge

Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository