Review economics
NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
99
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#9427 Fix LSDA type table base when @TType offset needs >1 ULEB byte
0 reviews · 2.8d to merge
#9421 Fix typo in WildRange constructor error message
0 reviews · 22h to merge
#9411 Fix NullPointerException in BundleStatusTableModel.bundleBuilt
0 reviews · 36h to merge
#9401 Fix OperandReferenceAnalyzer to recognize all undefined data types
0 reviews · 3.8d to merge
#9314 Fix export of merge prototype models in spec extensions
0 reviews · 26.8d to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 580 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Cursor agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository