Review economics
lissy93/web-check
Read from the 73 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
73
Other PRs
73
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#327 Upgrades dependencies and node versions
0 reviews · 4.5d to merge
#319 Add Render as deploy Option 4
7 reviews · 16.6d to merge
#331 Add Render to self-hosted setup 1-click deploy
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#329 Docker signed attestations and faster builds
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#326 ci: attach provenance and SBOM attestations to the published image
1 reviews · 4.5d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher.
Detected: OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read lissy93/web-check weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on lissy93/web-check — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository