Review economics
photoprism/photoprism
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#5421 Update Makefile for latest Ubuntu
0 reviews · 6h to merge
#5759 Tests: Ensure that moments-003 selects the correct moments album
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#5757 2 Test Fixes and 1 Error Handling correction within Entity
0 reviews · 2h to merge
#5655 PDF: Add inline multi-page document viewer for the lightbox #5488
1 reviews · 39.9d to merge
#5751 Faces: Import XMP regions from HEIC and RAW sources
0 reviews · 36h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 953 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read photoprism/photoprism weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on photoprism/photoprism — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository