Review economics
pixijs/pixijs
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.2× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥17%
Attributed
a floor
28
Attributed PRs
72
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#12104 feat: object-form bind/push and capturable, replayable bind state
5 reviews · 6.0d to merge
#12103 feat: copy depth into textures and expose resolved front-face orientation
1 reviews · 6.1d to merge
#12098 feat: add opt-in flipY render-orientation toggle
2 reviews · 18.6d to merge
#12093 fix: harden WebGPU render targets, bind groups & pipeline/texture caching
1 reviews · 22.9d to merge
#12050 feat: implement transientAttachment for MSAA RenderTextures for WebGPU
2 reviews · 19.4d to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#12121 fix: handle missing base in bitmap font parsers
1 reviews · 17h to merge
#12105 fix: use the correct vertex for the first edge in Triangle.strokeContains
1 reviews · 10.9d to merge
#12083 fix: Rectangle containsRect edge containment
2 reviews · 28.7d to merge
#12102 fix: add persistentDeviceId to FederatedPointerEvent
1 reviews · 6.7d to merge
#12094 chore: remove dead https://pixijs.io/customize link in v7 migration guide
1 reviews · 22.0d to merge
How this was measured
17% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 2 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 3871 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot coding agent, Cursor agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read pixijs/pixijs weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on pixijs/pixijs — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository