Review economics
responsively-org/responsively-app
Read from the 99 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥0%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
98
Other PRs
99
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#1520 Electron 43 upgrade
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#1465 fix(webview): ignore iframe did-navigate-in-page events to prevent un…
1 reviews · 8.5d to merge
#1478 fix: align preview layout store key
2 reviews · 4h to merge
#1483 E2e tests v2
1 reviews · 12h to merge
#1479 add Dailin521 as a contributor for code
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
0% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 99 of 512 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read responsively-org/responsively-app weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on responsively-org/responsively-app — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository