Company · Competitor

Statuspage

Read today · 1 reading on record

8
declares

as its own pages describe it; none was tested

5
users raised

themes in public — opinions, not a measurement

6
claims on record

each with its date, tag and source

1
sectors

placed in, on the map

What each week held

Withheld: something was read in 1 week of the last 12. A series needs at least 2 to say anything a single reading does not.

What it declares

  • Public status pages
  • Private/authenticated status pages
  • Audience-specific pages
  • SSO via Atlassian Guard
  • Custom CSS/HTML/JS branding
  • Email/SMS/Webhook notifications
  • Jira/JSM automation integration
  • API access for incident management

As the company’s own pages describe it. Forge did not test any of these.

What users raised

  • High cost for MSPs billing per client
  • Expensive for a single status page
  • Audience-specific add-on pricing ($300/mo) seen as costly
  • Perceived slow feature development since Atlassian acquisition
  • Not a monitoring tool, only a display layer

Themes people raised in public. A complaint is somebody’s opinion, not a measurement of the product.

Everything on record

6 observed claims. Newest first; the tag on each row is what kind of claim you are reading.

A record of what Forge read in public about Statuspage — its own pages and what people wrote about it. Nothing here is a test of the product, a ranking or a score, and Forge has no relationship with this company.

Start free

Competing with Statuspage?

An account reads your own product beside it, every week: what it ships, what it charges, what its users complain about — each line with its source — and where your product stands against the gap. Free to start, no card.