Company · Competitor

Sourcery

Read today · 1 reading on record

8
declares

as its own pages describe it; none was tested

3
users raised

themes in public — opinions, not a measurement

5
claims on record

each with its date, tag and source

1
sectors

placed in, on the map

What each week held

Withheld: something was read in 1 week of the last 12. A series needs at least 2 to say anything a single reading does not.

What it declares

  • AI-powered PR code review (GitHub/GitLab)
  • One-click fixes
  • Security scanning (secrets, SAST, IaC, dependencies, licenses)
  • IDE integration (VS Code, Cursor, JetBrains)
  • Sentry.io production issue monitoring/auto-fix
  • Per-seat pricing with free tier for open source
  • Zero code retention / no training on customer code
  • Enterprise SSO and BYOLLM

As the company’s own pages describe it. Forge did not test any of these.

What users raised

  • Limited to changed-file diffs, weak whole-codebase reasoning
  • Python-centric, weaker on other languages
  • Restricted platform support (GitHub/GitLab only)

Themes people raised in public. A complaint is somebody’s opinion, not a measurement of the product.

Everything on record

5 observed claims. Newest first; the tag on each row is what kind of claim you are reading.

  • COMPLAINTUSER OPINIONSep 30, 2026

    A comparison review notes that Sourcery 'runs a chain of specialized LLM reviewers on the changed files only, so the system struggles to reason about the rest of your codebase,' and recommends looking elsewhere for broader language depth or cross-file analysis.

    Highlights a limited cross-file/context-depth complaint that prospective enterprise buyers may weigh against competitors

    www.cubic.dev/blog/the-3-best-sourcery-alternatives-for-ai-code-review-in-2025
  • POSITIONINGFACTSep 30, 2026

    Sourcery's own site states <cite index="2-6">Sourcery reviews every pull request in GitHub and GitLab: bug findings, summaries, one-click fixes and security scanning.</cite> and <cite index="17-1">Sourcery keeps no copy of your code after a review and never trains AI on it.</cite>

    Establishes the vendor's core buyer-facing value proposition and privacy/data-handling promise

    sourcery.ai/code-review/
  • PRODUCTCOMPANY CLAIMSep 30, 2026

    A third-party directory reports Sourcery offers a 'Resilience Plus' add-on at roughly $200/month for production issue monitoring, and highlights enterprise controls including zero-retention options, no training on customer code, and SOC 2 certification with a Sentry.io integration for investigating and auto-fixing production issues.

    New capability tier beyond core code review that buyers evaluating enterprise security posture would weigh

    aidirectory.com/sourcery
  • PRICINGFACTSep 30, 2026

    Per the documentation's plan-limits page, <cite index="1-3,1-4,1-5,1-6">on the Free plan up to ten security issues are visible for 3 repos, Pro shows up to ten issues for up to 10 repos, Team shows unlimited issues for 200+ repos, and Pro/Team get daily security scans while Free gets scans twice per week.</cite>

    Defines the security-scanning packaging differentiator between tiers

    docs.sourcery.ai/Security-Scanning/Plan-Limits/
  • PRICINGFACTSep 30, 2026

    Sourcery's own homepage FAQ states <cite index="2-9,2-10">Pro is $12 per seat per month and Team is $24, billed annually, with open source free.</cite> <cite index="2-14">Enterprise runs Sourcery inside a customer's own infrastructure, with SSO, own LLM keys, a dedicated customer success manager and invoice billing.</cite>

    Establishes the baseline per-seat price anchor ($12 Pro / $24 Team) buyers will compare against competitors like CodeRabbit and Qodo

    www.sourcery.ai/

A record of what Forge read in public about Sourcery — its own pages and what people wrote about it. Nothing here is a test of the product, a ranking or a score, and Forge has no relationship with this company.

Start free

Competing with Sourcery?

An account reads your own product beside it, every week: what it ships, what it charges, what its users complain about — each line with its source — and where your product stands against the gap. Free to start, no card.