Company · Competitor

Greptile

Read 17 days ago · 2 readings on record

8
declares

as its own pages describe it; none was tested

4
users raised

themes in public — opinions, not a measurement

5
claims on record

each with its date, tag and source

1
sectors

placed in, on the map

What each week held

Withheld: something was read in 1 week of the last 12. A series needs at least 2 to say anything a single reading does not.

What it declares

  • Full-codebase semantic graph indexing
  • Cross-file bug detection
  • PR review automation (GitHub/GitLab)
  • Codebase Q&A chat
  • Self-hosting / air-gapped deployment
  • SOC2 Type II / SSO/SAML
  • REST API for internal tooling
  • Unlimited repositories on free tier

As the company’s own pages describe it. Forge did not test any of these.

What users raised

  • Per-review overage pricing breaks down for agentic/high-PR-volume workflows
  • No Bitbucket or Azure DevOps support
  • Auto-publishes findings without human approval step
  • Only supports Claude for review model (per some comparison sources)

Themes people raised in public. A complaint is somebody’s opinion, not a measurement of the product.

Everything on record

5 observed claims. Newest first; the tag on each row is what kind of claim you are reading.

  • POSITIONINGCOMPANY CLAIMSep 8, 2026

    Greptile positions itself around full-codebase understanding via a semantic code graph, claiming teams merge PRs 4x faster and catch 3x more bugs than without it.

    Baseline homepage positioning/buyer-facing claims to compare against future messaging changes.

    www.greptile.com/
  • FUNDINGCOMPANY CLAIMSep 8, 2026

    Greptile has raised a Series A led by Benchmark Capital at a $180M valuation.

    gitautoreview.com/compare/greptile-alternative
  • PRODUCTFACTSep 8, 2026

    Greptile supports only GitHub and GitLab, with no Bitbucket or Azure DevOps support, and offers self-hosting in a customer's own cloud including air-gapped VPC deployments for enterprise customers.

    Baseline for buyers comparing platform/VCS coverage against competitors.

    www.greptile.com/docs/introduction
  • PRICINGUSER OPINIONSep 8, 2026

    Greptile shifted in March 2026 from a flat $30/seat monthly rate to a model billing $1 per review once a seat's 50-review allotment is exceeded, which multiple users argue breaks down under agentic/high-PR-volume workflows and drew notable community backlash.

    Affects cost predictability for teams with heavy or AI-agent-driven PR volume; a known point of friction to monitor for further changes or reversal.

    www.agent-wars.com/news/2026-05-01-greptile-per-review-pricing
  • PRICINGFACTSep 8, 2026

    Greptile's pricing structure is a credit-based model: free Starter tier with 50 credits/month for one developer, Pro at $30/seat/month including 50 credits/seat, with 1 credit per standard review, 3 credits per TREX review, and $1 per additional credit beyond the included amount.

    Establishes baseline pricing/packaging that any future changes will be measured against.

    www.greptile.com/pricing

A record of what Forge read in public about Greptile — its own pages and what people wrote about it. Nothing here is a test of the product, a ranking or a score, and Forge has no relationship with this company.

Start free

Competing with Greptile?

An account reads your own product beside it, every week: what it ships, what it charges, what its users complain about — each line with its source — and where your product stands against the gap. Free to start, no card.